Nike Golf Athletes: Tour Wrapup 1.31.10

Here’s how the Nike Golf athletes fared at the tour events this past weekend:

PGA Tour: Farmers Insurance Open
Lucas Glover  T9  -10  278
Stephen Ames  T33  -4  284
Carl Pettersson  MC

Nationwide Tour: Michael Hill New Zealand Open
Jamie Lovemark  3  -12  276
Paul Gow  T28  -3  285
Brendan Todd  MC

European Tour:  Qatar Masters
Paul Casey  5  -8  280
Charl Schwatrzel  14  -5  283
Marc Warren  20  -4  284
Simon Dyson  28  -2  286
Richard Finch  49  +3  291
Pablo Martin  MC
Francesco Molinari  MC

Sandbox8.com Interviews Nike Golf’s Suzann Pettersen

Check out this great interview Rob from Sandbox8.com did with Nike Golf athlete Suzann Pettersen at the 2010 PGA Merchandise Show Outdoor Demo Day. Suzann talks about how she stays fit during the offseason, what she likes to do in her free time, why she officially switched to the Nike METHOD putter, and one of her hidden talents!

Picture 1

Click here to view the interview at Sandbox8.com >>

Nike Golf Athletes in the Field 1.28-1.31

Here are the Nike Golf athletes at the tour events this week:

PGA Tour: Farmers Insurance Open
Stephen Ames
Lucas Glover
Carl Pettersson

Nationwide Tour: Michael Hill New Zealand Open
Paul Gow
Jamie Lovemark
Brendan Todd

European Tour:  Qatar Masters
Paul Casey
Simon Dyson
Richard Finch
Pablo Martin
Francesco Molinari
Charl Schwatrzel
Marc Warren

Product Review: Nike METHOD Putter

METHOD_BOTTOMOkay, so I admit it, when the box arrived I felt a little bit like the father in “A Christmas Story” when the leg lamp arrives. I‘ve been watching this putter in action on the pro tours for over a year since I first saw Stephen Ames using a prototype of it on TV at the LG Skins game in the fall of 2008. I then learned that Paul Casey had been using the prototype since August 2008. Several other Nike Golf athletes began using the prototype putter on tour including Lucas Glover, Justin Leonard and Stewart Cink. The buzz continued to build as the name was announced and a release date was announced, and when a limited edition release of customized, personalized METHOD putters went on sale on November 2, 2009, the edition of 100 sold out in under 3 hours. Since then Nike Golf fans across the globe have been waiting for the day they could get their hands on one of these putters.

Anticipation becomes reality this Thursday January 28th as the METHOD putter hits the retail market. This weekend you can buy the same putter that Lucas Glover used to win the U.S. Open, Stewart Cink used to win the Open Championship, and Michelle Wie used in The Solheim Cup and to get her first LPGA Tour Victory. This past weekend I was able to take the METHOD putter out for a test drive, and I share my opinions of the putter here.

I headed over to the practice green at my local course Stonecreek Golf Club on both Saturday and Sunday to roll putts using the METHOD. I used three different balls – the Nike One Tour (4-piece), the Nike Crush (2-piece) and the Nike Power Distance Soft (2-piece). I rolled a total of about 100 putts with the METHOD and here was my experience with it:

FIRST IMPRESSION: DESIGN/APPEARANCE

Out of the box the METHOD putter did not disappoint. The putter looks as good in person as it does in all of the photos Nike put out in advance of its release (see below).The METHOD comes in 5 different models/styles — I tested the 001 model, which is an Anser-style heel-toe weighted design. The face is milled and the distinctive groove pattern is filled with black polymer. The sole has the METHOD logo and graphics per the photos, and the area on the back of the face also has the METHOD logo. The back of the heel and toe flanges sport the same diamond facet pattern as the VR STR8-FIT driver surrounded by a red oval paint inlay.

The METHOD has a stepless shaft with a shaft sticker that has the Nike swoosh on one side and the METHOD logo on the other. The grip is a strikingly distinctive red color with the METHOD logo on the flat front side and a grip pattern made up of the face groove pattern design on the curved backside. The headcover is an L-shaped leather cover with METHOD logos top and sides, and a handy magnetic closure that makes it easy to get the headcover on and off.

FIRST IMPRESSION: PERFORMANCE

If there’s one paragraph to read in this review it’s this one — I can’t tell you how great the feel of this putter is, and the difference was clearly evident in the first few putts I rolled with it. The first thing that is distinctive is the firm but soft strike of the ball, due to the polymer insert behind the entire face of the putter. The second is the roll the putter puts on the ball — it immediately gets the ball rolling with topspin and no skid, hop or bump. It really is amazing how the ball hugs the green and tracks towards the hole immediately after leaving the putter face. The third is the weighting of the putter — the weight of the head promotes a smooth pendulum stroke through the ball. I expand on these qualities in the sections below.

FEEL

The feel of the METHOD putter is truly outstanding. I have two other Nike putters — the Ignite 001, a similar Anser style with a slightly larger head and a full-face polymer insert, and the Unitized Retro, a blade style with a milled face. The METHOD blends the best qualities of these two putters — the softness of the polymer insert with the solid strike of the milled face. Nike achieves the soft feel by filling the channel behind the face with liquid polymer that then fills the grooves in the face. The grooves also contribute to the soft strike because there is less of the face in contact with the surface of the ball. The milled face gives the strike solidity that is in turn softened by the polymer behind the face. The firm and soft qualities work in concert with each other when the putter strikes the ball, and this feel was consistent with the different balls I tested (two 2-piece balls and one 4-piece ball).

ROLL

This is where the METHOD truly shines. The roll it puts on the ball is impeccable. The ball seems to zip towards the hole, immediately tracking on line as soon as it leaves the face. The grooves on the face seem to grip the cover of the ball, imparting topspin to the ball right away. It was uncanny how consistently it did this for me on the putting green. Each putt seemed to roll the same as the one before, and this made distance control and accuracy easier. The consistent roll the METHOD puts on the ball distinguishes it from any other putter I’ve owned — and take it from me (and my wife), I’ve owned a lot of putters over the years.

WEIGHTING

The weighting of the METHOD helped me to produce consistent distance control and accuracy. The weight of the head — substantial but not too heavy — promotes a naturally flowing pendulum stroke, critical for effective distance control. The well-balanced heel-toe weighting made it easier to keep the putter head square through impact, and subsequently to get the ball rolling on the intended line.

DISTANCE CONTROL

In my test I rolled a variety of lengths of putts including approximately 40-foot lag putts, 20 footers, 10 footers and putts 5 feet and closer to the hole. I was able to control the distance effectively on most of my putts, better than with either of my current putters. I putted balls in groups of three for each length putt, and the distance between all three balls for each putt length was very consistent — my 3-ball groupings were closer together than I can recall them being in any of my recent practice sessions.

ACCURACY

Because the METHOD gets the ball rolling so consistently, and I was able to control my distance effectively, of course my accuracy was better too. I was able to start the ball on line more consistently, and the ball stayed on line more consistently because of better distance control. Good putting is the result of the correct combination of speed and line — the METHOD allowed me to get both the speed right and keep the ball on line more consistently.

SUMMARY

The two words that I took away from my test of the METHOD putter were these: Consistency and Confidence. The feel in this putter and the smooth roll it puts on the ball are unmatched in any other putter I’ve ever used. The weighting promotes a smooth pendulum stroke that results in consistent distance control and improved accuracy. Consistent speed and line mean more putts made, and more putts made means increased confidence in your putting game. Confidence is the name of the game in golf, especially in putting.

Another side note — when I was doing the second part of my putting test on the practice green on Sunday, Richard from Michigan was there again (see the Summary of my review of the VR Driver). He asked to try the METHOD putter, and after rolling several putts with it he seemed to really like the feel. Again, Nike Golf might have another METHOD putter convert.

The METHOD is truly a game-changing putter, one I plan to get into my bag as soon as possible and keep there for a long time to come.

Read more about the Nike METHOD Putter >>

Check out the METHOD putter microsite on nikegolf.com >>

Editor’s note: The product reviewed above was supplied by the manufacturer to the reviewer/author free of charge for reviewing purposes only. The reviewer/author was not paid for this review, and the opinions expressed in the review are strictly those of the reviewer/author.

Product Review: Nike Victory Red STR8-FIT Driver

VRSTR8TR_DRV_SLDRIn 2009 Nike Golf released its line of Victory Red irons, consisting of three designs — a full cavity version, a split cavity version and a blade version. It was only a matter of time before Nike added a driver to supplement this successful series of iron designs. We first heard of the VR driver back in September in a series of tweets from Nike Golf athlete Paul Casey, when he tweeted photos from Nike Golf’s R&D facility The Oven in advance of the VR driver announcement. We received the release date for the VR driver in November, and we have since learned that fairway woods and hybrids have been added to the VR line, and all will be available this Friday January 28th along with the VR driver.

This past weekend I had the opportunity to take the VR STR8-FIT driver to the range to give it a test drive. On Sunday I headed over to the driving range at my local course Stonecreek Golf Club and hit the new VR driver along with the driver I currently use, the SQ Sumo. The day before I had gone to my local PGA Superstore to hit the SQ Dymo STR8-FIT again to refresh my memory as to the characteristics of this driver, and get some stats from the simulator there. All three drivers have 10.5 degrees of loft and a stiff flex stock shaft. I hit approximately 50 range balls with the new VR driver using three face angle settings — square, 1 degree open and 1 degree closed. I hit about a dozen balls with each setting. Here I share the results of my test and my opinions of the VR STR8-FIT driver:

FIRST IMPRESSION: DESIGN/APPEARANCE

Out of the box the first impression of the VR STR8-FIT is one of tradition meeting technology. The classic pear shape of the head is a step back from the square headed design of the SQ MachSpeed, and the slight ridge at the back edge of the crown subtly recalls the powerbow of previous driver designs. A handsome and durable metallic black paint job covers the crown, and a glossy finish on the crown is back after two years of a matte finish on the SQ 5000 and SQ Dymo.

The sole of the club reveals the red Compression Channel that resides just behind the leading edge of the clubface and continues back to the trailing edge. Design details like the diamond facet pattern at the back of the sole recall the same element in the back heel and toe of the METHOD putter (link). The black and red color scheme of the VR line distinguishes it from the yellow and black theme of the SQ line.

The stock Aldila Voodoo shaft has an attractive deep burgundy color and pattern, and the butt end of the grip has a dial pattern with lines for each of the 32 face position adjustments. The thoughtfully-designed headcover tops off the look with a combination of leather and nylon details, a handy magnetic closure that opens and closes easily, an embroidered swoosh on the front and raised VR logo on the top.

FIRST IMPRESSION: PERFORMANCE

The first swings on the range really gave me a feeling of power in this driver. The shaft is about an inch longer than the one in my SQ Sumo, so that alone gave me confidence that I could hit the ball farther. The weighting of the head in relation to the shaft and grip felt comfortable to me, the head did not feel too heavy or too light on the end of the shaft during the swing and the club makes a nice swoosh sound (no pun intended) through the hitting area.

There is a lot of technology in this driver, and knowing that the lie and face angles can be adjusted in 32 different combinations gave me even more confidence in the club. After hitting just a few balls I had the feeling that I had better control over my drives, and knowing the club can be tweaked to fit whatever is going on in my swing on a particular day (one of the main benefits I think an average recreational golfer like myself can get from the adjustability) gave me more faith in my swing and the assurance I could keep the ball in play.

ADJUSTABILITY

The STR8-FIT system makes the club very easy to adjust. The wrench that comes with the club is intuitive to use, and it takes just a few turns to loosen the locking nut and remove the head. Markings on the head and shaft collar make it easy to position the head in any one of the 32 adjustment positions, and grooves in the plastic piece at the end of the shaft guide the head into position. Tightening the locking nut is easy, and the wrench beeps when the locking nut is tight (the wrench has a battery-powered sensor in it).

The 32 face positions make this driver ideal for the better player who can take full advantage of the adjustability to dial in the driver to his particular swing tendencies. The face can be adjusted in .25 degree increments, and the lie angle adjusts from upright to flat (not sure of the degrees here). For the average recreational golfer whose swing is not as consistent (I speak for myself here), this amount and precision of adjustability might be a bit more than he or she really needs — but I think the real advantage here is that on any particular day you can adjust the face angle to counteract any particular negative swing tendencies that are happening in your warm up session. If on the range prior to your round you are slicing or hooking the ball, a few quick turns of the wrench and you can help to straighten out your drives for the particular day (per USGA rules players are not allowed to adjust the club during play).

I think the end result is a greater feeling of trust in your swing during a particular round of golf — if you feel the club will help you hit the ball a bit straighter, I think you’re more apt to swing more freely and with more confidence.

PLAYABILITY

In my test I hit about a dozen balls with the face square, a dozen more with the face 1 degree closed, a dozen more with the face 1 degree open, and a dozen more with the face adjusted back to square. I was able to consistently hit a draw with the face closed and a fade with the face open. Since I’m not the most consistent driver of the golf ball (understatement of the year), I feel this was at least partially due to the faith I had that the club would help me create the particular shot shape.

Because of the adjustability, a better player can adjust the club to help create a ball flight. If a course has a predominance of left-to-right holes, open the face for a fade. For more right-to-left holes, close the face for a draw. For a player like myself who is not always consistent, the adjustability creates the assurance that I can achieve a fade or draw with the help of the club.

DISTANCE

With my current SQ Sumo driver I average about 230-235 yards off the tee, that’s about 210-215 yards of carry and another 15-20 yards of roll (at least with the hard sun-baked ground here in Arizona). So I’m not going to win any long drive contests any time soon. These distances were confirmed with the launch monitor I borrowed again from my friend and teacher Jack Carter (see launch monitor photos below). I averaged about the same numbers on the simulator at the PGA Superstore the day before with the SQ Dymo STR8-FIT.

With the VR STR8-FIT I was definitely longer. With the club in the 1-degree closed position I was getting carry distances in the mid to high 220’s, which with roll would put me in the 240-250 range — I’ll take that. With the clubface in the square position carry distances were in the high 210’s to low 220’s, and in the open position carry distances were in the mid to high 210’s (again see monitor photos below). When I would really catch one on the center of the clubface the ball would just take off, pretty fun for an average player like myself.

ACCURACY

When I tested the VR driver and was intentionally trying to play a fade or a draw, with the face adjusted to be open or closed accordingly, I was able to play the particular shot more consistently because I had faith that the club’s adjusted face position would help me pull it off.

I’m not the most accurate driver off the tee, and my misses tend to be split pretty evenly between left and right. That being said, on a particular day I may tend to hit the ball more left or right. I feel that if I can determine what my predominant shot shape is on the practice tee (or if I‘m having a major tendency one way or the other) and I can set the driver to counteract that, I’ll have more success keeping the ball in play.

FORGIVENESS

I thought the VR STR8-FIT had a pretty big sweet spot. Mishit shots that did not contact the center of the face exactly ended up going almost as far as shots that I hit in right the middle of the club face. Of course the further out toward the toe or heel I hit the ball, the less distance I got, but if I hit the ball anywhere near the middle of the club face I got very good distance. So I felt this driver was not only long but forgiving too.

ACOUSTICS

If a particular driver model has a loud or inappropriate sound it can be distracting. This is not the case with the VR STR8-FIT — it has a sound similar to my current SQ Sumo driver. It’s different than the solid “thwack” that the SQ Dymo has, but the VR’s acoustics are in no way tinny or aluminum bat sounding. In my test the VR STR8-FIT made a solid, pleasing sound when I made contact with the ball.

SUMMARY

Nike has a winning driver design with the VR STR8-FIT. This attractive, traditionally shaped driver is heavy on technology, and its precise adjustability will allow the better player to tweak the club to their particular swing tendencies. The average recreational golfer can benefit from the confidence that comes with being able to adjust the club to help counteract negative swing tendencies and/or help them to play a particular shot shape. The VR STR8-FIT will allow players of all levels to trust their swing more, and swing the club more freely for longer, more accurate drives and a more enjoyable golf game overall.

A fun note here — as I tested the VR driver I caught the eyes of a few of the other golfers on the range. I struck up a conversation with one of these players, Richard from Michigan, and he asked me if he could try the VR driver with the face adjusted to the 1 degree closed position, to counteract the fade he had been playing. I watched him hit a few drives and sure enough, his fade straightened right out. A few long and straight drives later, Richard handed the driver back to me, seemingly pleased. Who knows, maybe Nike Golf has a VR STR8-FIT convert customer on their hands.

I personally can’t wait to put this driver in my bag and see my drives fly not only longer, but more importantly where I want them to go.

Read more about the Nike VR STR8-FIT Driver >>

Check out the VR Driver microsite on nikegolf.com >>

Editor’s note: The product reviewed above was supplied by the manufacturer to the reviewer/author free of charge for reviewing purposes only. The reviewer/author was not paid for this review, and the opinions expressed in the review are strictly those of the reviewer/author.

Take a Virtual VIP Tour of The Oven

The-Oven

In this video from Nike Golf we get see what goes on behind the scenes at their famed state-of-the-art Research and Development facility in Fort Worth, Texas.

Here’s how Nike Golf describes the video:

Now you can go behind the scenes on a VIP tour and see how the greatest minds in golf technology team up with top athletes for a winning combination of innovation and inspiration. From the new METHOD putter technology to the new SQ MACHSPEED drivers—see what’s cooking at the Oven.

Check out the virtual VIP Tour of Nike Golf’s “The Oven” >>

Nike Golf Athletes: Tour Wrapup 1.25.10

Here’s how the Nike Golf athletes fared at the tour events this past weekend:

PGA Tour: Bob Hope Classic
Carl Pettersson  T39  -17  343
Jamie Lovemark  T48  -15  345
David Duval  MC
Justin Leonard  MC
Craig Stadler  MC

Champions Tour: Mitsubishi Electric Championship at Hualalai
John Cook  T22  -8  208

European Tour: Abu Dhabi Golf Championship
Anthony Kim  T13  -12  276
Francesco Molinari T13  -12  276
Paul Casey  T27  -9  279
Simon Dyson  T37  -7  281
Marc Warren  T43  -5  283
Richard Finch  T69  +1  289
Oliver Fisher  MC

Nike Nuggets 1.21.10

  • Michelle Wie has tested the new VR STR8-FIT Tour driver and likes what she feels.  It is quite possible that she will put this driver in the bag for her next LPGA tournament.
  • Sterling Sharpe, Evan Longoria, Derek Anderson and Bo Jackson all stopped by the Nike Tour Van to check out the new 2010 products.  They all walked away with new Nike products in their bag for the Bob Hope Classic.
  • David Duval and Jamie Lovemark are both testing 18 degree VR hybrids.  They could decide to put them into play this week.
  • Carl Pettersson had a VR Split Cavity 4 and 5-iron made for him, these could possibly make it into the bag this week.  He is currently playing with VR Blade irons 5-PW.

* The content for the post above was provided by Nike Golf.

Nike Golf Unveils New Premium Hybrids in the Victory Red Line

VR_HY_SLDR-PPTNike Golf is introducing a new hybrid that has been developed as a result of the meticulous work done by Nike’s team of engineers along with Nike’s talented athletes on Tour – the Victory Red (VR) Hybrids.

The VR Hybrids, as with the entire VR line, convey beauty, refinement and premium sophistication.  Created to perform for the best players in the world, the VR Hybrids feature a Tour-inspired design that enhances the power of physics.  Nike Athlete Charl Schwartzel already has won with an 18-degree Nike VR Hybrid in his bag on the PGA European Tour in 2010.

To optimize workability and distance, Nike Golf has slightly opened the face angle and shifted the center of gravity.

“We have accomplished what we wanted to with these hybrids,” said Tom Stites, Director of Club Creation for Nike Golf.  “We wanted to achieve a higher launch angle with significantly less spin. We’ve done that through altering the face angle and finding the proper center of gravity measurements.”

To achieve longer distance, the VR Hybrids feature a 455 Ultra Thin Face with Nike’s distinctive Split Compression Channel that also exists in the VR STR8-FIT Fairway Woods.

Availability:  January 28, 2010 at golf shops and specialty stores nationwide.

Men’s Loft Options:  #1/15-degree (RH); #2/18-degree (RH/LH); #3/21-degree (RH/LH); #4/24-degree (RH/LH); All available in X,S,R,A

MSRP:  $203.99

Editor’s Note: The post above is from a press release from Nike Golf.

Nike Golf Athletes in the Field 1.20-1.24

Here are the Nike Golf athletes at the tour events this week:

PGA Tour: Bob Hope Classic
David Duval
Justin Leonard
Carl Pettersson
Craig Stadler

Champions Tour: Mitsubishi Electric Championship at Hualalai
John Cook

European Tour: Abu Dhabi Golf Championship
Paul Casey
Simon Dyson
Richard Finch
Oliver Fisher
Anthony Kim
Francesco Molinari
Marc Warren